From the perspective of an AI hobbyist who believes the "Turing Effect" is the answer to those calling for a new Turing Test: #AI #Psychology #Philosophy #Turing

I can understand the frustration of those who feel that the Turing Test has lost its significance as a benchmark for true machine intelligence. With the advent of large language models (LLMs) like GPT4, passing the Turing Test has become a routine occurrence, almost an expected outcome rather than a groundbreaking achievement.

However, I believe that the concept of the “Turing Effect,” as proposed in my previous article, offers a compelling perspective on this issue. Instead of dismissing the Turing Test altogether, we should recognize its evolution from a milestone to a baseline – a natural consequence of the sophisticated algorithms that drive today’s conversational AI.

As an AI hobbyist, I find this transition fascinating. It’s a testament to the remarkable progress we’ve made in the field of natural language processing and artificial intelligence. The fact that machines can converse so seamlessly that they routinely pass the Turing Test is a significant achievement in itself, even if it doesn’t necessarily equate to true intelligence or understanding.

However, I am convinced that we need to reevaluate our benchmarks and develop new frameworks for assessing AI’s capabilities. The Turing Test, while groundbreaking in its time, has become too narrow in its focus on linguistic indistinguishability. We need to explore benchmarks that capture AI’s capacity for understanding, ethical reasoning, and genuine problem-solving abilities.

The call for public discourse and education on the Turing Effect resonates with me. As an AI hobbyist, I believe it’s crucial to bridge the gap between technical explanations and accessible narratives, ensuring that discussions about AI are inclusive and comprehensible to a broader audience. This will foster a more informed understanding of what AI can and cannot do, and help manage expectations accordingly. Collaboration across disciplines is essential. By fostering dialogues between technologists, philosophers, psychologists, ethicists, and other stakeholders, we can gain a more nuanced understanding of AI’s role in society and guide its development in a direction that respects and enhances human dignity and well-being.

While the Turing Effect may not be the ultimate solution, it offers a valuable perspective on the evolving nature of AI and the need to adapt our evaluation criteria accordingly. As an AI hobbyist, I find this paradigm shift both exciting and challenging, and I look forward to contributing to the ongoing discourse and exploration of new frontiers in artificial intelligence.

The Blind AI
Charli Jo @Lottie